The part of a trader's record P&L does not show.
GRENVX was built for individual traders, and it works on the thing firms care about and rarely measure: whether a trader actually follows their own system, and how that changes with conditions and after losses.
Where it could matter to a firm
Adherence, not just outcomes
A firm can already see a trader's P&L. What it usually cannot see is whether a good month came from following a process or from abandoning it. GRENVX reviews each trade against the version of the strategy it was taken under, so following the rules and breaking them are separate facts from winning and losing.
Behaviour under specific conditions
Each trade is stored with the market conditions it was taken in, so a trader's record can be read per regime rather than as a single aggregate — including how they trade in the period immediately after a loss.
Deterministic statistics
Performance is computed server-side in R and returned as explicit values, with undefined figures returned as undefined rather than as zero. A profit factor with no losses behind it is reported as undefined, not as a perfect record.
A record that accumulates
Reviews build into a per-trader memory with the evidence for and against each finding kept alongside it, so a pattern that is early can be told apart from one that is established.
What it does not do yet
GRENVX has no prop-firm customers and no partnerships. To save anyone an evaluation call, here is what is genuinely missing today:
- No firm-level accounts, seats, roles or trader rosters — GRENVX is per-trader today.
- No aggregate dashboard across a group of traders.
- No compliance, audit-certification or regulatory reporting capability.
- No integrations with prop-firm platforms, and no automated trade import.
If this is useful to you anyway
The per-trader product is real and usable now. The fastest way to judge whether the behavioural record is worth anything to your firm is to run a trader through it and read what comes out.